Occam’s razor "the simplest explanation is usually the right one"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
Personal Online Journal
Occam’s razor "the simplest explanation is usually the right one"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
-
I have come to understand how useless it is to dwell on the whys, what ifs, and if onlys for which there likely will be given no answers in mortality. To receive the Lord’s comfort, we must exercise faith. The questions Why me? Why our family? Why now? are usually unanswerable questions. These questions detract from our spirituality and can destroy our faith. We need to spend our time and energy building our faith by turning to the Lord and asking for strength to overcome the pains and trials of this world and to endure to the end for greater understanding.
What a wonderful I quote I found in "Come Follow Me Insights (Doctrine and Covenants 37-40, Apr 12-18) at 31:10", https://youtu.be/9U9fQURv8EE?t=1870
It is from Robert D. Hales, "Healing Soul and Body" Oct 1998.
Also from this episode is this quote from Richard G. Scott from "Trust in the Lord", Oct 1995
It really does no good to ask questions that reflect opposition to the will of God. Rather ask, What am I to do? What am I to learn from this experience? What am I to change? Whom am I to help? How can I remember my many blessings in times of trial?
There are several stories from Ken Alford
Personal applications of principles when going through...
"Ken, with out being too personal .. how did it affect your personal identity and who you are?"
- Leukemia in the family
- Other family challenges
"Heavenly Father can comfort infinitely. He knows the end from the beginning. We don't know how some of these stories are going to turn out yet, but it's going to be OK."
-
I have known Melanie Wellman Stroud for well over 15 years. I remember attending a ward or stake fireside back when I first knew her. It was about how she studies the Book of Mormon. It inspired me.
She has since had a roller coaster of experiences. She has been hosting a podcast called Come Follow Me for Us since January 2019. One of her perennial topics is how we all need to study The Book of Mormon every day.
For many years now, I have had the goal of reading or listening The Book of Mormon every day. For the last six months I have been reading or listening to The Book of Mormon for least 15 minutes every day.
I don't know if I can say too much about what is does for me. It has been an anchor to me when many others had slipped away. It roots me to Jesus Christ who is my only hope. It has chided me in many ways. It has been a way for me to know that I have been having revelation.
I love The Book of Mormon. It verifies the truth of the Bible. I know that as I live by its teachings, I will overcome the world through my Savior Jesus.
Here is Melanie's podcast on the Book of Mormon.
https://comefollowmeforus.com/bomstudy/
Here are links to how to get it as a podcast.
Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3vCK5Xkn8WnybenySfrHv7?si=qTwLmQEsQASTXJF7fRUK8w
Apple - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/come-follow-me-for-us-podcast/id1448229352
Here is a Google Doc that has some key quotes and promises and how Melanie was taught to study The Book of Mormon by her mission president. "The Book of Mormon: The Liahona of our Lives"
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CFDrfwTnmbqGEuprDR0u1IpUxIWSMo3xfOxgPDkElw4/edit?usp=sharing
Melanie Wellman Stroud
From a FB Post, 11 Apr 2021
I am listening to episode 5 of "The First Vision: A Joseph Smith Papers Podcast. Eight minutes in, a professor Steven C. Harper of BYU talks about the nature of memory and why there were different accounts of Joseph Smith's first vision.
8:23 - 12:45 question "Why are there different accounts?"
Following is a selection of the transcription of “It Caused Me Serious Reflection” (The First Vision Podcast, Episode 5) from 8:25 - 12:45 in the audio that answers the question "Why are there different accounts?"
The four gospels of the new testament.
The way memory works. A present production of the shards of the past.
We view the past through the lens of the present.
From the transcription:
Spencer: All this talk of record keeping brings us to a question that many Latter-day Saints have asked about Joseph Smith’s first vision. Why are there different accounts?
The answer: there are different accounts of the First Vision because Joseph Smith described the event to different audiences at different times. Naturally, the different accounts vary in emphasis and detail because each was told in a different context. Nevertheless, the various accounts tell a consistent story.
Now, historians expect differences in the accounts of historical events if they were created at different times and under different circumstances. In fact, such differences in detail and emphasis often help historians and other scholars piece together a fuller story.
For instance, think of the accounts of Jesus’s life and His resurrection in the Bible—the four gospels. There are four different accounts told in different contexts that emphasize different details. Scholars of the Bible and early Christianity do not reject the accounts because of the differences but instead understand the different accounts as a benefit to their scholarship.
So, the different accounts of the First Vision can be studied in a similar way. And they not only help us better understand the vision itself. The different accounts help us better understand Joseph Smith’s life and the early history of the church he led. As Steven Harper explains, this has a lot to do with the way that memory works, that in addition to Joseph relating the vision at different times to different audiences, the various accounts are also formed by the nature of memory itself.
Steve: So, the answer to why these different accounts to me lies in the science and the psychology of memory. Memory is not what we often assume it is. Memory is not a recording of our past that’s like this podcast recording. We could replay it ten years from now, and it’ll sound the same. It’ll be the exact same recording, no matter how many times you play it or how distant in time we play it. That is not how memories work, not at all.
A memory is a present production that is made from a combination of cues that are stored somewhere in our minds somehow. Nobody knows for sure how, but “traces” of the past, as Daniel Schacter at Harvard calls them. “Traces” is his word.
So, it’s the past or pieces of the past—you might think about it as shards of the past—and present. The present environment in which we are remembering has a lot to do with the shape that memory will take.
Spencer: What Steve is describing is really interesting to me. As I understand it, what is happening in the present influences the way we remember events in the past. Our circumstances in a given moment also influence what aspects of those events we choose to emphasize. When we are talking about memory, context matters. And it matters a lot.
In other words, we view the past through the lens of the present. That’s how our memories work.
So, how does this influence the way that Joseph Smith remembered and retold the First Vision at different times?
Steve: So, what is happening in Joseph’s present to cue the memory in the first place, and then help him recover some of the shards or traces he has at his disposal, and put them together in the particular way he does at the time—that’s the way to get at the differences in the accounts.
Spencer: If we want to understand the differences in the accounts of the First Vision and uncover new and deeper meaning from Joseph Smith’s experiences, then we need to ask what was happening in Joseph Smith’s life at the moments in which he recounted the First Vision. In short, to move beyond the question of why there are different accounts of the First Vision to the question of what insights can we gain from studying the different accounts, we need to look at what cues informed the way Joseph remembered and told audiences about the event.
A link to the other episodes of "The First Vision: A Joseph Smith Papers Podcast"